Some people may ask, If the existence of God is so manifest, why do so many people not believe in Him? If the glory of God is declared by the very heavens, why isn’t belief in God equally universal? If no one is going to be able to claim ignorance at the judgment, then how are they able to claim ignorance now? At first, these may seem like legitimate questions. But let’s consider a couple of points in response.
First, the Bible teaches that God created man with free will. God gave a command, but said there are consequences to disobeying those commands. That implies that man has the ability to disobey God’s commands. Indeed, there has to be the ability for man to reject God, or man is nothing more than a robot. A robot will do whatever you command it to do, but a robot doesn’t love or care or empathize, a robot just does as it is programmed. Not even artificial intelligence can supply the emotional basis needed.
I asked ChatGPT: Is ChatGPT or any other ai sentient?
ChatGPT said: “No, neither ChatGPT nor any other AI is sentient. AI, including me, operates based on algorithms, data, and statistical models. While I can generate human-like responses, understand context, and even mimic emotions, I don’t have consciousness, self-awareness, feelings, or independent thought. Sentience requires subjective experience and self-awareness, which AI does not have. AI can process and analyze information efficiently, but it doesn’t ‘understand’ or ‘feel’ in the way humans do.”
Then I asked, “Maybe ChatGPT just isn’t as advanced as other ai?” It responded this way:
“Even the most advanced AI today, including cutting-edge models beyond ChatGPT, are not sentient. AI can simulate intelligence and conversation very convincingly, but at the end of the day, it’s still just a complex system of pattern recognition, probability, and computation.
No AI—whether from OpenAI, Google DeepMind, Anthropic, or any other research lab—has true self-awareness, emotions, or independent thought. AI can analyze and predict based on data, but it doesn’t experience anything.
That being said, AI is advancing rapidly, and discussions about artificial general intelligence (AGI) and consciousness in machines are ongoing. But as of now, no AI is anywhere close to actual sentience.”
I would argue that regardless of the time given, or the computational power available, or imaginative algorithms employed, no ai could ever reach sentience or free will because its not a matter of quantity but of quality. No amount of inanimate matter will ever achieve animate status just by adding more inanimate matter. No amount of non-sentient computing power could ever reach sentience just by adding more non-sentient computing power. Its not a matter of quantity but quality.
So man has free will, something neither a computer nor algorithm can ever have. One of the reasons men can reject the evidence for God, is because man was created with the ability to chose based on his own, volitional interests.
In the second place, just because a thing is obvious, doesn’t mean everyone wants it to be true or that everyone will fall in line with the truth. People often have ulterior motives for their actions, sometimes motives that they don’t even fully understand. On the other hand, sometimes people are fully aware of their reasons for denying the obvious.
A person who is given bad news might not want to accept it. A person who is given good news might not accept it, at first. The Psalmist said, “Why do the heathen rage, and the people imagine a vain thing? The kings of the earth set themselves, and the rulers take counsel together, against the LORD, and against his anointed, saying, Let us break their bands asunder, and cast away their cords from us” (Psalm 2:1-3). These verses depict man consciously trying to break away from the bonds that tie him to God, only it’s a vain and futile attempt. The Psalm was fulfilled violently and particularly in the rejection and crucifixion of Christ by the Jews and Gentiles (Acts 4:23-30). There is no clearer example of men rejecting God than in the rejection of Messiah.
The truth is, it comes down to a person’s heart. If a person is not honest with themselves, they will allow themselves to believe anything they want. The Lord’s parable of the sower teaches us that truth itself is not enough. If truth is seen as a seed, truth requires good soil before it can bring forth fruit. The good soil for truth is an honest and good heart. Many people do not have an honest and good heart and, for various reasons, the truth produces no fruit in them. The evidence of God’s existence, though obvious to all, requires an honest and good heart to admit it is true.
The following is a short list of quotes from men who did not believe in God and admitted that they didn’t want to believe and acknowledged that their rejection of God was influenced by personal, moral, or existential concerns rather than purely intellectual reasoning.
“I had motives for not wanting the world to have a meaning; and consequently assumed that it had none, and was able without any difficulty to find satisfying reasons for this assumption. The philosopher who finds no meaning in the world is not concerned exclusively with a problem in pure metaphysics. He is also concerned to prove that there is no valid reason why he personally should not do as he wants to do. For myself, as no doubt for most of my friends, the philosophy of meaninglessness was essentially an instrument of liberation from a certain system of morality. We objected to the morality because it interfered with our sexual freedom. The supporters of this system claimed that it embodied the meaning – the Christian meaning, they insisted – of the world. There was one admirably simple method of confuting these people and justifying ourselves in our erotic revolt: we would deny that the world had any meaning whatever.”
–Aldous Huxley, Ends and Means
“We desired liberation; and we had a suspicion that the things to which we wanted to be liberated had no meaning. Still, we wanted to be free to do as we pleased.” – Aldous Huxley (another relevant passage from Ends and Means)
Again, he links his disbelief to a desire for personal freedom.
“The sense of spiritual relief which comes from rejecting the idea of God as a superhuman being is enormous.” – Julian Huxley (Aldous Huxley’s brother, biologist and humanist)
Like his brother, Julian Huxley saw disbelief as a form of liberation from religious and moral constraints.
“We deny God; in denying God we deny accountability: only by doing that do we redeem the world.” – Friedrich Nietzsche
Nietzsche saw belief in God as tied to moral accountability, and rejecting God meant rejecting imposed moral structures.
“I want atheism to be true… It isn’t just that I don’t believe in God and naturally hope that I’m right in my belief. It’s that I hope there is no God! I don’t want there to be a God; I don’t want the universe to be like that.” – Thomas Nagel (philosopher and atheist)
Nagel openly admitted that his atheism was not just about reason but also about personal preference.
And so many people reject God simply because they don’t want there to be a God. They don’t want to be burdened by any moral constraints. They don’t want to be responsible to God. They don’t want there to be a moral accountability that reaches into eternity.
There are many other reasons people reject the idea of God but it is clear that just because the evidence for the existence of God is available, it does not mean that all men will acknowledge it. But whether or not we accept it, it is still true and all men will eventually acknowledge it (Phil. 2:11; Rev. 2012-15). That is why the fool has said in his heart there is no God (Psalm 19:1).
Eric L. Padgett